Based on the meta-analysis it appears that early goal-directed therapy is at worst only more costly than usual care, but not harmful. In your conclusions, you suggest that the treatment interactions showing harm towards those with severe liver failure were probably spurious. Are there other studies showing EGDT is harmful? There was an article in JAMA last October that showed definite harm with an early resuscitation protocol in hospitalized patients in Zambia. While the study suggests we may not be as good at the physical exam as we think we are, it also hypothesizes that those with severe illness and malnutrition may be a more vulnerable population. Is there anything we can apply from this study to patients we see in the academic setting? Do you approach these patient’s differently? If so, can you discuss how you would approach, or advise a resident to approach, a septic patient who with end-stage cirrhosis, HIV, etc?
Ref: Andrews B, Semler MW, Muchemwa L, et al. Effect of an early resuscitation protocol on in-hospital mortality among adults with sepsis and hypotension: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.10913
Easy one-click social registrationIs this safe?
We only receive the minimum information necessary to verify your account. We never get access to your friends/contacts or your profile, and we never post on your behalf. Your social account is used for logging in only.ORRegister via email
Send me updates on this Contest
In order to ensure a fair voting process and to make sure that no one votes more than once, we ask that you register either with a social networking account (easiest, only requires one click) or by registering with your email address (this will require you to click on a verification email that we will send you).
You only need to register once.