Could you comment on choosing the upper boundary for the 95% confidence interval? In the statistical analysis it mentioned that 1.38 was chosen because that's what was used by the FDA for registration of trials of newer anticoagulants. But if the hazard ratio for thromboembolic events was close to 1.38 would providers really feel comfortable using the results to guide their practice?
Easy one-click social registrationIs this safe?
We only receive the minimum information necessary to verify your account. We never get access to your friends/contacts or your profile, and we never post on your behalf. Your social account is used for logging in only.ORRegister via email
Send me updates on this Contest
In order to ensure a fair voting process and to make sure that no one votes more than once, we ask that you register either with a social networking account (easiest, only requires one click) or by registering with your email address (this will require you to click on a verification email that we will send you).
You only need to register once.