A recent survey of physician prescribing practices found that “…53.1% of surveyed physicians reported having personally refrained within the past 6 months from using specific clinical services that would have provided the best patient care, because of health system cost. Prescription drugs (n = 1073 [48.3 %]) and [MRI] (n = 922 [44.5 %]) were most frequently rationed.” link.springer.com/article/10.1...
This suggests physicians have a sense of moral hazard on behalf of the entire healthcare system. This raises a fascinating ethical question as the physician’s duty it to first treat the patient before them, but should we consider the larger systemic and public health impact of using an expensive resource in a system over-burdened by costs? Is this happening because we feel like the other parts of the system are failing to control costs and we know that care is already being rationed on price & not in the way that is best for everyone as a society? Should we make point of care cost-effectiveness data available in EMRs & encourage doctors to have shared decision making conversations with patients comparing cost-effectiveness a quality process metric?
Easy one-click social registrationIs this safe?
We only receive the minimum information necessary to verify your account. We never get access to your friends/contacts or your profile, and we never post on your behalf. Your social account is used for logging in only.ORRegister via email
Send me updates on this Contest
In order to ensure a fair voting process and to make sure that no one votes more than once, we ask that you register either with a social networking account (easiest, only requires one click) or by registering with your email address (this will require you to click on a verification email that we will send you).
You only need to register once.