Many iterations of this particular concern can be found in comment threads and editorials discussing the question of the Annual Physical/Periodic Health Exam. In its distilled form, the worry appears to be that elimination of the physical will lead to a drop in preventive and/or asymptomatic care, leading to an increased number of patients seeing their PCP only after conditions have progressed to a point of some urgency. In many ways this is an extension of a longer-running popular criticism of the US healthcare system, which argues that elimination of the physical further exacerbates a system which historically focuses on "sick care" rather than "health care".
Certainly, neither article advocates for such a model of primary care. Nonetheless, given the prevalence of this concern, let's address it directly: is there merit to this worry? Might the primary care profession risk an element of its identity by scrapping the time-honored Physical? Or are such concerns overblown?
Easy one-click social registrationIs this safe?
We only receive the minimum information necessary to verify your account. We never get access to your friends/contacts or your profile, and we never post on your behalf. Your social account is used for logging in only.ORRegister via email
Send me updates on this Contest
In order to ensure a fair voting process and to make sure that no one votes more than once, we ask that you register either with a social networking account (easiest, only requires one click) or by registering with your email address (this will require you to click on a verification email that we will send you).
You only need to register once.