Question special
Trainee St 4-8

Thank you all for the discussion so far, it has been really interesting.
We have touched on the fact that LMIC are a heterogeneous group, with variable resources/current practices/cultures - did you note any particular barriers or especially positive engagement in some participating countries over others?
I note India was the biggest contributor of participants, and unsurprisingly seemed to have the greatest site specific treatment effect with regards to the primary outcome - do you have any thoughts as to why there was a larger number of participants recruited here?